Flash Art


David Elliott talks about the 4th Moscow International Biennale for Young Art
Tatiana Martyanova
This Is Cannibal Island Now
Lodovico Pignatti Morano
Gary Indiana
Monir is always the answer
Maurizio Bortolotti
The remarklable journey of Iranian artist Monir Shahroudy Farmanfarmaian, a pioneer in contemporay Middle Eastern art
Hou Hanru
Helena Kontova
Mary Margaret Rinebold
Articles archive

Gary Murayari

Flash Art n.262 October 2008




FOR THE 55th CARNEGIE International, Rudolf Stingel has produced two new large goldhued paintings with a subtle pattern repeated across the surface of the canvases. Viewers familiar with Stingel’s work may recall this pattern from Stingel’s 2004 work, Plan B, a carpet installed in New York’s Grand Central Terminal and the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis. In Plan B, the fl oral pattern appeared in pink and blue on a carpet spread out across the fl oor. This shift from wall to floor and back again is a familiar trajectory for Stingel. He has deployed vast expanses of industrially produced carpeting across either of these architectural elements and has treated both the horizontal and vertical plane as equally suitable sites for painterly action. Untitled (2008) does, however, reveal a notable development in Stingel’s recent work.

After exhaustively examining the dynamics of painterly surface for over 20 years, Stingel has recently turned his attention towards the images that his paintings can capture.  



Untitled, 1994-96. Cast bronze, 45 x 48 cm. Courtesy Paula Cooper Gallery, New York.

Jörg Heiser has described Stingel’s paintings as “permeable membranes” capable of

“recording traces of use.” In order to understand Stingel’s turn towards the image,

it may be useful to extend Heiser’s observation and consider Stingel’s surfaces as acting as cameras capable of recording any and all images they encounter. In the past, Stingel has used a variety of unorthodox materials, from carpet to Styrofoam to Celotex panels, all chosen for their ability to capture indexical marks made by the artist or the viewer. What is often neglected in discussions of these works is the attentiveness Stingel has paid to the resulting image produced by these seemingly impersonal acts of recording. An Untitled painting from 2000 carved into pink Styrofoam was composed to create a familiar target pattern, but even works created with more arbitrary techniques produce recognizable images. Stingel’s white Styrofoam paintings from 2002 were created by the artist walking across panels placed on the floor, but they depend equally upon the viewer’s recognition of these marks as footprints with corresponding poetic and romantic associations. Stingel’s paintings created by viewers inscribing graffi ti-like marks in walls clad in aluminum insulation panels succeed because the viewer associates the work with a mental image of gestural abstract surfaces employed by artists such as Jackson Pollock or Cy Twombly.

Acknowledging the importance of specifi cimagery in Stingel’s earlier work, it becomes easier to trace the recent incorporation of representational photography into what had been a mostly abstract approach to painting. Starting with his portrait of gallerist Paula Cooper (Untitled, 2005), Stingel has been embarking on a series of paintings based on photographic portraits, all signifi cantly taken by other photographers. The portrait of Cooper, based on a Robert Mapplethorpe photograph, was hung on one wall of her gallery, paired only with a white vinyl fl oor that captured dirty footprints from any viewer who entered the space. Both of these surfaces were used to record the presence of a physical body and to serve as a document that those bodies had once inhabited that particular space. The painting of Cooper also drew the viewers to the back of the gallery space, consequently forcing them to mark their passage on the floor’s surface. The entire installation acted as a site for capturing different actions and extending them out into space. Stingel’s next engagement with photography arrived as a series of black-and-white self-portraits painted in 2006 [“Untitled (After Sam),” 2005-06]. These works, some monumental and others small and intimate, were all painted after photographs taken by the artist Sam Samore. Stingel and his assistants enlarged Samore’s dramatic images into paintings using a painstaking but ultimately mechanical process.


Untitled, 2005. Installation view at Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. Based upon the Robert Mapplethorpe portrait of Paula Cooper. (Paula Cooper, 1984 © Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation). Photo: Adam Reich.

Below: Untitled (Bolego), 2006. Oil on canvas, 5-part polyptych, 38 x 52 cm each. Courtesy Massimo De Carlo, Milan. Photo: Alessandro Zambianchi.

These paintings may evoke a number of art-historical references for the viewer in their composition and monumental scale, but the process allows Stingel to keep any self-expressive content out of the finished paintings. In this way, even as the image of the artist moves from photograph to painting, it maintains the impersonal quality that the camera can provide. Most importantly, Stingel does not produce the image that appears on the canvas, leaving the act of representation to the photographers themselves. It is more accurate to describe the labor of these paintings as a sequence of framing, selection and translation. This framing can be seen in white Styrofoam footprint paintings, whose arrangements of two or four panels of Styrofoam were taken from a much larger field of panels that covered the entire floor of Stingel’s studio.

It was also deployed in a barely-noticed pair of works in his survey exhibition at the

MCA Chicago. Stingel produced two blacklacquer doorways at either end of a single

small gallery within the installation. Acting as a subtle but distinct threshold between spaces, the doorways forced the viewer to treat everything that they observed through them, whether it be other artworks or other visitors, as a picture. More recently this approach has led to a series of gold, silver and black paintings based on particular patterns of historical wallpaper. In these works, Stingel treats each pattern as an image capable of evoking specifi c historical and architectural spaces and styles. By using these patterns as paintings, however, he is not simply attempting to recreate their luxurious (or kitschy) effects, but also expects them to function in relationship to the surrounding space. He attends to the wall, fl oors and ceilings of the exhibition space precisely because the viewer can never permanently shut out these distractions.

These wallpaper paintings act as fragments of historical surfaces, partial memories in the mind of the viewer that trigger arresting moments in the continuity of the visual fi eld. The surfaces of these paintings also distort their relationship to the surrounding architecture. After applying the pattern to the surface of the canvas in a single color, subtle highlights are hand-painted over the top, creating illusions of light and shadow. The paintings are then no longer extensions or accumulations on the wall; rather they are artifi cial slivers of time existing somewhere outside of the viewers’ own. 


Untitled, 2003. Polystyrene and silicon on canvas, 198 x 260 cm. Courtesy Massimo De Carlo, Milan. Photo: Alessandro Zambianchi.

As Stingel weds his recent photographybased works with his ongoing concern with

painting’s relationship to three-dimensional space, his images start to take on a more

active presence and slowly broach a connection to cinema. This burgeoning relationship was hinted at in his installation of carefully choreographed self-portraits.

An exhibition of the small-scale self-portraits in Edinburgh’s Inverleith House [“Louvre (After Sam),” 2006] allowed the viewer to start to make temporal connections between the separate canvases. While not necessarily sequential, the paintings act almost as jump cuts moving across different moments in the same event. The viewer can not

help but try and use these images to reconstruct the scene depicted. The large-scale self-portraits displayed push this relationship even further, taking Samore’s already

cinematic photographs and giving them the monumental presence of the movie screen.

These images are pictures just starting to come to life. Even when dramatic in

scale, the mundane nature of Stingel’s appearance and gestures suggests the gentle

flicker of home movies or even the casual, accidental magic of early cinema.

It is clear that the incorporation of photography into his practice has allowed Stingel to extend the experience of individual canvases even further than before.

Returning to Stingel’s newest work, Untitled (2008) perhaps best captures his preoccupation with the movement of images across surfaces and across time.

Like the preceding wallpaper paintings, Untitled (2008) depends on the relationships between flat pattern and an illusion of volume and light that border on the photographic. The floral pattern of the Plan B carpet entered the stream of images that Stingel has produced and calls upon to manipulate, re-frame, fragment and project in any number of ways.

In doing so, Stingel remains constantly attentive to how the viewer looks at any picture and how their experience can shift and transform over time. Vanderbilt Hall in Grand Central Terminal and the entryway to the Walker both began as physical spaces that existed as images in the minds of thousands of visitors. Stingel’s feat was to transform these images by applying this found pattern to trace over a single architectural plane. The result is a new picture in the viewers mind, one intimately tied to the appealingly soft surface of the carpet itself. This image then fractures again when it reaches the sumptuous surfaces of the gold paintings, thus losing its color scheme and moving from fl oor to wall. Stingel’s paintings depend upon a viewer moving through threedimensional space, engaged in an active visual perception that is constantly translated into memory. It is this process that Stingel relies upon to turn action into image and image into painting.


Gary Murayari is Senior Curatorial Assistant at the Whitney Museum of American

Art, New York.

Rudolf Stingel was born in Merano, Italy, in 1956. He lives and works in New York.


Selected solo shows: 2008: Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. 2007: Sadie Coles HQ, London; MCA, Chicago; Whitney Museum of American Art, New York. 2006: Massimo De Carlo, Milan; Inverleith House, Edinburgh. 2005: EURAC Tower, Bolzano, Italy; Paula Cooper Gallery, New York. 2004: Sadie Coles HQ, London; Walker Art Center, Minneapolis/Grand Central Terminal, New York; Museum für Moderne Kunst,

Frankfurt. 2002: Galerie Georg Kargl, Vienna. 2001: MART, Trento and Rovereto,

Italy; Stephen Friedman Gallery, London.

Selected group shows: 2008: 55th Carnegie International, Pittsburgh, USA. 2007: “Sequence 1,” Palazzo Grassi, Venice. 2006: Whitney Biennial, Whitney Museum of  american Art, New York; “Where Are We Going?,” Palazzo Grassi, Venice; “Infi nite Painting,” Villa Manin, Passariano, Italy. 2005: “Universal Experience: Art, Life, and t

he Tourist’s Eye,” MoCA, Chicago; “Bidibidobidiboo,” Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo, Turin. 2004: “Singular Forms (Sometimes Repeated),” Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. 2003: 50th Venice Biennale. 2002: “Shimmering Substance/View Finder,” Arnolfi ni Gallery, Bristol, UK. 2001: “Painting at the Edge of the World,” Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, USA. 2000: “Examining Pictures:  xhibiting Paintings,” Whitechapel, London/MoCA Chicago/ UCLA Hammer Museum, Los Angeles.


RUDOLF STINGEL and URS FISCHER, installation view at Massimo

De Carlo, Milan 2006. Photo: Alessandro Zambianchi. 


Giancarlo Politi Editore - via Carlo Farini, 68 - 20159 Milano - P.IVA 09429200158 - Tel. 02.6887341 - Fax 02.66801290 - info@flashartonline.com - Credits